|
|
 |
Surprising export through September
US$ 1,344 billion; 26.4 millions units
41% of high added value; 59% of low added value
Export of hide continues as a surprise for 2006. Final export data covering January through September 2006 of chapter 41 of NCM, has presented a growth of 29% in value and 24% in quantity, when compared to the same period of 2005, as per table 5. When the analysis is restricted to the export of bovine hides see table 1 the growth in value is of 30% and 27% in quantity. Missing only the export of the fourth quarter of 2006, the expectation is that the export in value at the end of 2006 will reach an approximate amount of US$ 1,8 billion, a historic record.
Through the end of September, approximately 26.400.000 bovine hides left the country. From this total, we can say that 41% in high added value hide and 59% of lox added value hide, basically in the Wet Blue stage. The proportion between the export with and without added value bothers the analysts. The current relation - for each exported added value hide, 1,43 hides without added value is exported - is seen as a waste by some entities and as a threat by others.
The waste can be measured in value. If the relation would be inverted, only during the first nine months of 2006, the country would have accounted more than US$ 250 millions in its benefit, this means, the lack of pro-export mechanisms and instruments, in majority in the highest added value, results in a significant financial loss.
The threat would go beyond the hide segment and would reach the relations of the several links of the productive chain - mainly footwear - specifically in the trading activity as the international market.
Tables 1 through 4 indicate a significant growth in export of hide - with specific highlight for those of the bovine origin 27% in quantity and 30,7% in value - which is in contrast with the reality not always positive of preponderance in the export of a product which value is US$ 29 in detriment of other having a value of US$ 80 a unit. Export occurs in this case, without restrictions, based on the free game of the market trends The sole restriction which is present a tax of 7% in 2006 and 4% in 2007 is applied on the Wet blue hide -, does not result, in theory in direct effect in export of added value, although some believe that the initial application of tax (9% in 2001) has resulted in the installation of new Trimmed hide plants, which would bring their participation, to a total of one third.
When considering the reality of the preponderance of the Wet Blue hide, of extremely low added value and if compared with the destination it has, the analysis deviates towards the side of the structural threat of the footwear-leather chain. Table VI imposes the reality of the preponderance of the destination China plus Hong Kong. 44,5% of the Brazilian hide, basically in the Wet blue stage is exported for those regions. Brazil would be transforming itself in a hostage of the Chinese market, with twice as much perverse effect, this means, they would buy the low added value raw material and would transform it into footwear equally of low added value and which is exported to the United States, progressively taking over the Brazilian marketplace in the United States. An estimated loss of more than 40 million pairs which should have been sold to the United States. The hide that is exported to Italy also competes at the point of the productive chain with the differential that the dispute is occurring in the highest added value footwear where Brazil has no tradition as yet. Loosing market share of low added value is a threat that is not considered for the future as it is already happening now
Another phenomenon that is produced due to the China factor, is that not only leather is being exported to that country but also technicians that, under normal situation, would be working here. Complete organizations are also leaving. And these complete organizations will become new threats in the future as they will wish to bring into Brazil a production made in China and for this reason will be fighting for the reduction in import duties. Supplying the Chinese industry (whether Chinese or Brazilian property) of low cost hide, Brazil is becoming a potential suicide when the subject is the footwear-leather chain. This affirmation has nothing to do with the free market, this means, what is behind it is the governmental inertia, the passive acceptance that nothing can be done to defy the Chinese in the footwear segment (as well as in textiles) and that we should conform ourselves in having an insignificant role when comparing forces. Even respecting the free market, without imposing restrictions, Brazil should adopt procedures that stimulate the reversal of the scenario, as there is no businessman that would not like to sell at US$ 29 what could be sold at US$ 80. If the central government does not wish to adopt a policy directed to stimulation of added value hide export, then it should not apply any type of restriction - such as for example application of a tax - which main objective is to obtain approximately US$ 35 millions per year from the private sector without any qualitative counterpart.
The debates within the tanning industry, as can be seen in another article of this edition, have shown that there are two streams. One that defends not only the application of a tax on export of Wet Blue, but that is should be applied at a real inhibiting level, well above the current 7%, even up to the double of this percentage. The other stream does not accept the tax, as this tax is seen as an unnecessary transfer of resources from the private sector to the public sector. It also criticizes, and with good reason, the lack of governmental programs and projects directed to the transformation of the Wet blue exporter into exporter of higher added value hide. This stream believes that the majority of the current Trimmed hide exporters has already started export of Wet Blue hide, which in this meaning, has achieved the role of "business card" for the Brazilian hide, breaking preconceptions and natural inhibitions of those that were not exporting in the past.
The final balance reveals that export of hides is progressively growing, generating an expectation to reach the amount of US$ 2 billions by the end of 2007, an unimaginable amount a few years ago. The national tanning industry adequately supplies the internal market and there is no other mean other than to export the excess, but, the government as well as the corporations should make an additional effort to qualify the Brazilian export. This is not what is happing at this moment. Contribution of the hide export to the Brazilian balance of trade has been growing progressively in importance, lacking only the quality jump that the industry has proven to be capable to face. Thus, the governmental stimulation is fundamental, as its absence in the debate only favors the non-committed export, the one that, even if legitimate, has an immediatist vision that can provide satisfactory results at present, but for sure will generate negative effects in the future and characterize definitely the country as a mere supplier of low added value raw material..
This was not the vision of CICB and of the businessmen of the segment a decade ago, but the lack of debate and of interest of the organizations have resulted in what we are seeing now. Profits at short term are growing, but future is uncertain.
Table 1 Leather Exporation / By Nº of Hides
January to September 2006 x 2005
|
Kind of leather |
Jan/Sep 2006
|
Jan/Sep 2005
|
2006/2005 (%) |
Salted |
166.147 |
172.766 |
-3,83% |
Wet Blue |
15.411.824 |
11.738.705 |
31,29% |
Crust |
2.601.750 |
2.589.396 |
0,48% |
Finished |
8.220.389 |
6.242.710 |
31,68% |
Sub-Total |
26.400.110 |
20.743.577 |
27,27% |
Soles |
136.245 |
94.135 |
44,73% |
Sheep |
443.741 |
340.045 |
30,49% |
Goats |
240.597 |
637.377 |
-62,25% |
Total Geral |
27.220.693 |
21.815.134 |
24,78% |
Source: SECEX
Organization: Courobusiness
Table 2 Leather Exportation/ By Value US$ 1.00
January to September 2006 x 2005
|
Kind of leather |
Jan/Sep 2006 |
Jan/Sep 2005 |
2006/2005 (%) |
Salted |
1.680.131 |
3.635.179 |
-53,78% |
Wet-Blue |
447.496.097 |
317.853.046 |
40,79% |
Crust |
175.423.804 |
173.237.726 |
1,26% |
Finished |
658.679.939 |
486.651.773 |
35,35% |
Sub-Total |
1.283.279.425 |
981.377.724 |
30,76% |
Soles |
10.949.836 |
7.184.566 |
52,41% |
Sheep |
6.645.176 |
5.308.727 |
25,17% |
Goats |
2.183.726 |
2.506.445 |
-12,88% |
Total Geral |
1.303.058.163 |
996.377.462 |
30,78% |
Source: SECEX
Organization: Courobusiness
Table 3 - Leather Exportation / Average exporting value
January to September 2006 x 2005
|
Kind of leather |
Jan/Sep 2006 |
Jan/Sep 2005 |
2006/2005 (%) |
Salted |
10,11 |
21,04 |
-51,94% |
Wet-Blue |
29,04 |
27,08 |
7,23% |
Crust |
67,43 |
66,90 |
0,78% |
Finished |
80,13 |
77,96 |
2,79% |
Sub-Total |
48,61 |
47,31 |
2,75% |
Soles |
80,37 |
76,32 |
5,30% |
Sheep |
14,98 |
15,61 |
-4,08% |
Goats |
9,08 |
3,93 |
130,81% |
Total Geral |
47,87 |
45,67 |
4,81% |
Source: SECEX
Organization: Courobusiness
Table 4 - % participation in quantity exported
January to September (2006 and 2005)
|
Kind of leather |
Jan/Sep 2006 |
Jan/Sep 2005 |
Salted |
0,63% |
0,83% |
Wet Blue |
58,38% |
56,59% |
Crust |
9,86% |
12,48% |
Finished |
31,14% |
30,09% |
Total Geral |
100,00% |
100,00% |
Source: SECEX
Organization: Courobusiness
|
Table 5 - BRAZILIAN EXPORTS OF HIDES AND SKINS (CHAP 41) Jan/Sep 2006/05 |
VALUE (US$) |
GROWTH (%) |
QUANTITY (KG) |
GROWTH (%) |
MONTH |
ANO 2006 |
ANO 2005 |
VAR06 |
MÊS |
ACUM. |
ANO 2006 |
ANO 2005 |
VAR06 |
MÊS
MONTH |
ACUM. |
Jan |
112.481.705 |
97.449.804 |
-15% |
15% |
15% |
30.483.749 |
22.644.786 |
-6% |
35% |
35% |
Fev / Feb |
128.958.715 |
101.471.017 |
15% |
27% |
21% |
31.997.736 |
23.377.850 |
5% |
37% |
36% |
Mar |
161.725.650 |
122.187.437 |
25% |
32% |
26% |
39.680.467 |
29.800.210 |
24% |
33% |
35% |
Abr / Apr |
140.157.676 |
113.099.501 |
-13% |
24% |
25% |
33.111.749 |
26.087.296 |
-17% |
27% |
33% |
Mai / May |
160.020.644 |
120.655.231 |
14% |
33% |
27% |
36.391.707 |
29.390.983 |
10% |
24% |
31% |
Jun |
159.964.493 |
120.653.255 |
0% |
33% |
28% |
36.831.446 |
28.988.239 |
1% |
27% |
30% |
Jul |
150.025.144 |
106.650.291 |
-6% |
41% |
30% |
29.189.122 |
24.891.944 |
-21% |
17% |
28% |
Ago / Aug |
173.272.600 |
135.312.293 |
15% |
28% |
29% |
37.063.201 |
32.577.877 |
27% |
14% |
26% |
Set / Sep |
158.289.472 |
121.855.923 |
-9% |
30% |
29% |
32.873.411 |
29.604.619 |
-11% |
11% |
24% |
Out / Oct |
|
110.926.696 |
|
|
|
|
27.746.306 |
|
|
|
Nov |
|
118.918.700 |
|
|
|
|
29.488.381 |
|
|
|
Dez / Dec |
|
131.948.845 |
|
|
|
|
32.259.912 |
|
|
|
Total |
1.344.896.099 |
1.401.128.993 |
|
|
|
307.622.588 |
336.858.403 |
|
|
|
Source: AICSUL
Table 6 - DESTINATION OF HIDES AND SKINS EXPORTS BY COUNTRIES (CHAP 41)
2005/06 - BRASIL |
COUNTRIES |
VALUE (US$) |
PERCENTAGE |
QUANTITY (Kg) |
PERCENTAGE |
Jan/Sep 06
|
Jan/Sep 05
|
PART06 |
05/06
GROWTH |
Jan/Sep 06 |
Jan/Sep 05 |
PART06 |
05/06
GROWTH |
Italy |
351.659.070 |
244.133.207 |
26,15% |
44% |
96.791.277 |
68.142.881 |
31,46% |
42% |
Hong Kong |
258.560.336 |
185.499.463 |
19,23% |
39% |
86.348.958 |
74.070.467 |
28,07% |
17% |
China |
208.827.030 |
169.670.269 |
15,53% |
23% |
50.651.676 |
43.017.304 |
16,47% |
18% |
USA |
154.877.612 |
116.483.619 |
11,52% |
33% |
10.716.813 |
8.513.057 |
3,48% |
26% |
Taiwan |
32.582.123 |
28.851.050 |
2,42% |
13% |
5.572.734 |
6.755.941 |
1,81% |
-18% |
Portugal |
29.972.343 |
4.933.047 |
2,23% |
508% |
2.433.913 |
465.325 |
0,79% |
423% |
Canadá |
24.944.919 |
24.128.276 |
1,85% |
3% |
8.490.446 |
9.228.749 |
2,76% |
-8% |
Malaysia |
24.246.225 |
24.744.371 |
1,80% |
-2% |
5.204.191 |
4.877.662 |
1,69% |
7% |
South Africa |
23.605.792 |
23.366.727 |
1,76% |
1% |
2.138.495 |
2.007.617 |
0,70% |
7% |
Japan |
23.410.408 |
7.445.329 |
1,74% |
214% |
5.734.656 |
1.081.435 |
1,86% |
430% |
SUB-TOTAL |
1.132.685.858 |
829.255.358 |
84,22% |
37% |
274.083.159 |
218.160.438 |
89,10% |
26% |
Other countries |
212.210.241 |
210.079.394 |
15,78% |
1% |
33.539.429 |
29.203.366 |
10,90% |
15% |
TOTAL |
1.344.896.099 |
1.039.334.752 |
100% |
29% |
307.622.588 |
247.363.804 |
100% |
24% |
Source: AICSUL
Table 7 - BRAZILIAN LEATHER EXPORTATION BY NCM CLASSIFICATION
January to September 2006
|
NCM CLASSIFICATION |
(KG)
WEIGHT |
PART
(%) |
US$ FOB |
PART
(%) |
Nº OF HIDES |
AVERAGE PRICE |
BY LEATHER |
BY KILO |
1. Salted/Pickled bovine skins up to 14 kg (ave. 14 kg) |
1.137.198 |
0,37% |
773.745 |
0,06% |
81.228 |
9,53 |
0,68 |
2. Salted Bovine hides above 14 kg (ave. 25 kg) |
2.122.957 |
0,69% |
906.386 |
0,07% |
84.918 |
10,67 |
0,43 |
3. Bovine Wet Blue hides up to 2.6m (ave. 9 kg) |
35.984.116 |
11,70% |
79.349.699 |
5,90% |
3.998.235 |
19,85 |
2,21 |
4. Bovine Wet Blue hides, incl. Scrappings (ave. 16 kg) |
182.617.422 |
59,36% |
368.146.398 |
27,37% |
11.413.589 |
32,26 |
2,02 |
5. Bovine hide soles (ave. 18 kg) |
2.452.405 |
0,80% |
10.949.836 |
0,81% |
136.245 |
80,37 |
4,46 |
6. Bovine hides,without finishing, incl. Vegetable (ave. 6 kg) |
14.793.029 |
4,81% |
164.473.968 |
12,23% |
2.465.505 |
66,71 |
11,12 |
7. Bovine hides with finishing (ave. 6 kg) |
49.322.333 |
16,03% |
658.679.939 |
48,98% |
8.220.389 |
80,13 |
13,35 |
Subtotal - Bovine Hides |
288.429.460 |
93,76% |
1.283.279.971 |
95,42% |
26.400.109 |
48,61 |
4,45 |
Other hides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horse hides |
12.694.008 |
4,13% |
46.639.814 |
3,47% |
|
|
|
Sheep hides |
443.741 |
0,14% |
6.645.176 |
0,49% |
|
|
|
Goat hides |
240.597 |
0,08% |
2.183.726 |
0,16% |
|
|
|
Pig hides |
14.066 |
0,00% |
119.987 |
0,01% |
|
|
|
Reptile hides |
3.950 |
0,00% |
95.011 |
0,01% |
|
|
|
Other animal skins |
28.830 |
0,01% |
1.610.695 |
0,12% |
|
|
|
Chippings and reconstructed leather |
5.767.936 |
1,88% |
4.321.719 |
0,32% |
|
|
|
Subtotal Other Hides |
19.193.128 |
6,24% |
61.616.128 |
4,58% |
|
|
|
TOTAL OF CHAP 41 - HIDES |
307.622.588 |
100,00% |
1.344.896.099 |
100,00% |
|
|
|
Source: AICSUL
Revista Courobusiness Ed. 48 Set/Out 2006
|
|
|
|